{"id":8723,"date":"2021-09-30T06:13:35","date_gmt":"2021-09-30T06:13:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/?p=8723"},"modified":"2021-09-30T06:18:20","modified_gmt":"2021-09-30T06:18:20","slug":"ip-litigation-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/","title":{"rendered":"A Complete Analysis of IP Litigation in India"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-drop-cap\">Over\nthe last few decades, IP Litigation in India has considerably developed right from\nthe signing of the <strong><em>TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement\n<\/em><\/strong>by the Government of India to the current scrapping of the <strong><em>IPAB\n(Intellectual Property Appellate Broad Tribunal). <\/em><\/strong>With the ongoing\nevolution of IP Litigation in India, the process has become comparatively\nstreamlined and highly effective. Scroll down to check more information\nregarding IP Litigation in India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_65 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-light-blue ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<label for=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-6a3b6be44daf5\" class=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-label\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/label><input type=\"checkbox\"  id=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-6a3b6be44daf5\"  aria-label=\"Toggle\" \/><nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/#What_is_IP_Litigation\" title=\"What is IP\nLitigation?\">What is IP\nLitigation?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/#Importance_of_IP_Litigation_in_India\" title=\"Importance of\nIP Litigation in India\">Importance of\nIP Litigation in India<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/#Discussing_IP_Litigation_in_India_and_its_Development\" title=\"Discussing IP\nLitigation in India and its Development\">Discussing IP\nLitigation in India and its Development<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/#An_Overview_of_IP_Dispute_in_India\" title=\"An Overview of\nIP Dispute in India\">An Overview of\nIP Dispute in India<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/#What_are_the_Recent_Trends_in_IP_Litigation_in_India\" title=\"What are the Recent Trends in IP Litigation in India?\">What are the Recent Trends in IP Litigation in India?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/#Closing_of_IPAB\" title=\"Closing of\nIPAB\">Closing of\nIPAB<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/ip-litigation-in-india\/#Conclusion\" title=\"Conclusion\">Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_is_IP_Litigation\"><\/span>What is IP\nLitigation?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>IP\nLitigation enables the protection of intellectual creations or innovations,\nwhich comprise creative works produced via the honest efforts of human\nintelligence. Such creations or innovations can be classified into artistic,\nliterary, dramatic, or musical work and invention &amp; innovative designs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Importance_of_IP_Litigation_in_India\"><\/span>Importance of\nIP Litigation in India<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>IP\nLitigation in India is fair and suitable that the individual putting in the\nefforts &amp; skills in an intellectual invention is provided with some\nadvantages as an outcome of their hard work and dedication. For this reason,\nthe legislation in India protects such innovations or inventions and creative\nworks in the method of the <strong><em>Trademarks Act, 1999, the Copyright Act,\n1957, the Patent Act, 1970, the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout\nDesigns Act (SICLDA) 2000, and the Designs Act 2000<\/em><\/strong>. These acts give an\nexclusive right to the IP owners concerning their Intellectual Properties\n(IPs). When Intellectual Property is safeguarded by such laws or Acts, they\nbecome intangible assets and act as a method in increasing the valuation of\nartistic creations, brand names, and inventions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meanwhile, over the years, many types of Intellectual Property disputes have also come to light with the arrival of IT (Information &amp; Technology). Such conflicts are evident in the form of <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/trademark-infringement\" class=\"text-primary\">Trademark Infringement<\/a><\/strong>, Patent Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Design Infringement, Domain Names Disputes, and Passing-off. This makes it essential to know the growth of IP Litigation in India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Discussing_IP_Litigation_in_India_and_its_Development\"><\/span>Discussing IP\nLitigation in India and its Development<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Concerning IP disputes, two types of cases can be filed against infringement activities depending on the necessities; <strong><em>Criminal Litigation<\/em><\/strong> in Criminal Jurisdiction Courts and <strong><em>Civil Litigation<\/em><\/strong> in Civil Jurisdiction Courts.<\/li><li>Civil actions in Intellectual Property can be divided into two different parts; one is passing-off or common-law action and infringement action. While the former is filed for Patents, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/copyright-registration\" class=\"text-primary\">Copyrights<\/a><\/strong>, Trademarks, and Designs disputes, the latter is a definitive resource only in Trademark actions.<\/li><li>In civil courts, IP owners can implement their exclusive rights by <strong><a class=\"text-primary\" href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/trademark-registration\">Trademark Registration<\/a><\/strong>, Copyright Registration, Patent Registration, and Design Registration or through common law rights in Copyrights &amp; Trademarks by the excellent value of their prolonged use &amp; invention.<\/li><li>With the expansion of internet activity &amp; Trademarks registered as domain names, another addition to the sorts of civil action in Intellectual Property Disputes is <strong><em>Domain Name Infringement<\/em><\/strong>. Besides civil action, the utmost level domain names like .org, .com, etc., may also be approved under the methods of the <strong><em>UDDRP (Uniform Domain-name Dispute Resolution Process) <\/em><\/strong>that was set up to resolve disputes concerning internet domain names registration. Specifically, in India, the .in domain is used, and it is approved under the <strong><em>Indian Domain-name Dispute Resolution Process method<\/em><\/strong>.<\/li><li>Owing to the immense amount of in-progress litigation in Indian courts, the Intellectual Property stakeholders are ongoing to create a difference between cases that may be resolved mutually via alternate dispute resolution methods such as mediation, arbitration &amp; conciliation.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"An_Overview_of_IP_Dispute_in_India\"><\/span>An Overview of\nIP Dispute in India<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>Under the traditional process,\nthe first phase in a civil proceeding usually stays for three to three years.\nOnly after this stage, the written statements, expert evidence, framing of\nproblems, and admission of evidence take place, thus pushing the final hearing\nfurther down by five to eight years from the suit filing.<\/li><li>According to the present trend\nin India, IP Infringement matters are disposed of within one to two years. This\nis because, since 2016, IP disputes have been deemed commercial disputes by the\nintegrity of the <strong><em>Commercial Courts Act, 2015<\/em><\/strong>. These disputes are heard at High\nCourts known as commercial benches, which function under a stringent timeline\nfor quick disposal of suits or cases. The High Courts have set out stringent timelines\nfor each stage of the case and the final hearing.<\/li><li>The hearing of a provisional\napplication in the starting stage of a trial is regarded as a deciding aspect\nof accomplishing the objectives of an infringement case. The Commercial Courts\nAct has enabled the courts to give imperative relief to maintain the rights of\nIP owners. Consequently, commercial courts in Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai have\nbeen vigorously upholding the right of IP owners.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_are_the_Recent_Trends_in_IP_Litigation_in_India\"><\/span>What are the Recent Trends in IP Litigation in India?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>In the past years, IP owners have been bends towards taking civil actions because of the rapid disposal of cases by the commercial benches in High Courts. The courts in such civil infringement suitcases have awarded penalising, compensatory, and ideal damages.<\/li><li>In the case of civil actions, the spectrum of assistance that may be claimed ranges from ruling orders, search &amp; seizure orders to accounts of costs, damages, and profits. In case of criminal actions, search &amp; seizure orders &amp; damage of violating goods orders are easily attained.<\/li><li>Disputes regarding a domain name, an injunction avoiding the use of domain name is granted instantly against the similar variants of the banned websites which were used in large numbers, wherein the infringers were generally back with an alternative of a website.<\/li><li>Hence, to handle the condition, the courts now grant <strong><em>Dynamic Injunctions<\/em><\/strong>, in which the IP owner is only required to inform the court of the new variant websites. Further, the previous order avoiding the domain names is instantly applicable on the succeeding variants of the same. This emphasises that India&#8217;s current Intellectual Property regime is observing a change in the protection of IPR.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Closing_of_IPAB\"><\/span>Closing of\nIPAB<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>With\nthe closing of the <strong><em>Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB)<\/em><\/strong>, the pending cases\nare going to be listed before the commercial benches of different High Courts.\nThis new development or improvement has received mixed reviews from different\nreputed legal personalities; while some reviewed the closure of the tribunal whereas,\nothers appreciate the move.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2003, the tribunal was established under <strong><em>Trademarks Act, 1999<\/em><\/strong><sup><a href=\"https:\/\/legislative.gov.in\/sites\/default\/files\/A1999-47_0.pdf\" class=\"text-primary\"><strong><em>[1]<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/sup>, and was exercising actual and appellate jurisdiction under the condition of <strong><em>Patents Act 1970<\/em><\/strong>, <strong><em>Copyright act, 1957, Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration &amp; Protection) Act, 1999, and Trademarks Act, 1999<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The speedily developing IP Litigation in India makes sure that the rights of IP holders are duly recognised &amp; effectively enforced by courts. Such trends show that the viewpoint is encouraging for IP owners in the times to come. With the closure of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, it is observed that due to the tribunal absence, an increasing number of parties will choose another dispute resolution process. This new wave of processes will cover the way forward for IP Litigation in India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"text-left\"><b>Read our article<\/b>:<mark style=\"background: #fffd03 !important;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/technology-transfer-agreement-in-terms-of-ipr-and-competition-law\/\">Examining Technology Transfer Agreement from the Perspective of IPR and Competition Law<\/a><\/mark><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last few decades, IP Litigation in India has considerably developed right from the signing of the TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement by the Government of India to the current scrapping of the IPAB (Intellectual Property Appellate Broad Tribunal). With the ongoing evolution of IP Litigation in India, the process has [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":8724,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[695],"tags":[865],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8723"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8723"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8723\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8730,"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8723\/revisions\/8730"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swaritadvisors.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}