PDC: All about Dishonour of Post Dated Cheque

Dishonour of Post Dated Cheque
Neha Saxena
| Updated: Mar 11, 2019 | Category: Legal, News

In the lending world, banks / financial institutions have been a common norm insisting on borrowers taking dishonour of post-dated check as security. These post dated cheque (PDC’s) were astras (weapons) in the hands of the financial institution used to twist the borrowers ‘ arm and also act as a deterrent to ensure borrowers are not defaulting.

What is PDC?

A post-dated check is a check issed wherein the issuer stated a date later than the current date. In the following situations, a post-dated check is used:

  • Deliberate delay in payment: This is done by the issuer to delay payment to the recipient, whereas the recipient can accept it simply because the check is a firm date on which the check can be deposit. This situation poses a risk to the check recipient, as the passage of time can lead to no cash left on the bank account of the issuer being used to pay the amount.
  • Collection of Methods: The recipient may require a set of post-dated checks from the issuer to cover a series of future payments that the recipient agrees to cash on the dates specified. This approach is used to enhance payment chances, especially when the issuer has little credit.

The Supreme Court [1] ruled that dishonour of any post dated cheque issued as an advance payment by any purchaser cannot be regarded as a discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability and would, therefore, not amount to an offense.

Also, Read: What is the Procedure to File Cheque Bounce Case?

What are the main Components of PDC?

Post-dated check simply means that it is effective from the date of signing. However, there are points that are important for you to know about other than the validity of the check, such as:

  • PDC can only become a check on the date which was present in the document.
  • It’s just a bill of exchange before that said.
  • The validity of the post-dated check is only 3 months from the date appearing on the document.
  • PDC insurance is either as loan security checks or as advance.
  • Primarily to ensure its supplier’s trustworthiness.

Are the dishonour of post dated Cheque legal in India?

According to the latest decision of the Supreme Court on 138 Negotiable Instruments Act in a check bounce case, if there is an issue of PDC for any advance payment for any supply of goods, purchase services is not a discharge of a legitimate debt security, then it will not attract Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

The facts of the case was the loan agreement as to issue the recorded of dishonor of post-dated check.It was issued as security for payment of the loan instalment (principal and interest). The clause of the Agreement to be considered was “The loan together with interest, liquidated damages, interest tax, commitment fee, upfront fee prima on repayment or reimbursement, costs, expenses, and others. Monies shall be secure by depositing post-dated checks for repayment of the principal amount payments by the agreed repayment schedule and installation.

It is one of the most common legal actions taken by lenders against borrowers and, as we all know, section 138 of the NI Act is the most dreaded section about checking dishonour, which could lead to a few months to the check drawer. For your ready reference, the section text is listed below:

Under the provisions of the said Act, the legal penalty for dishonour of post-dated check is:

  • Imprisonment for up to 1 year.
  • A fine equivalent to twice the amount specified on the dishonored cheque or both (Post Dated Cheque ), as decided by the authority

Provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

The dishonour of cheque is a punishable offense under Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138. Let’s understand how the act applies to the post-dated checks. According to the meaning of the post-dated check itself, once PDC becomes a check, i.e. from the date it is payable on demand, a legitimate liability is then applied as issued. But the check will only be dishonored because of insufficient funds or the reasons specified in the Act.

  • The check has been submitted to the bank within six months from the date on which it is drawn or within a period of validity whichever is earlier.
  • The payee or the holder, as the case may be, submits a request for payment of that amount by notifying the drawer of the check in writing within thirty days from the date on which the check is drawn.
  • The drawer of such cheque shall not make payment to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder of the check within fifteen days of receipt of the said notice of payment.

The appeal before High Court

The appellant approached the High Court, seeking to quash complaints from 18 checks with a total value of Rs. 103 million approximately. It was argued that the checks were issued as security and that no debt or liability was due on the same date on which the checks were issued. In other words, the post-dated checks were not to discharge existing debt or liability, but rather for a future amount; therefore, it was argued that Section 138 of the Act was not applicable.

The judgment of the High Court

The High Court dismissed the appellant’s claim and held that. In the present case, when the dishonor of post-dated check was issued, the loan was sanctioned and hence the same fall in the first category that in the present, but payable in the future, they were released for a debt. So I don’t find any reason to quash the complaints. These observations are of a prima facie nature, however, and it will be open to the party to prove the opposite during the trials.

As per the latest decision of the Supreme Court on 138 N.I. Act in a check bounce case. if there is an issue of PDC for any advance payment for any purchase/supply of goods/services is not a discharge of a legitimate debt security, then it will not attract Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

What is the time limit to file a Cheque bounce case?

According to the Negotiable Instruments Act, a legal notice must be sent within 30 days of the check bounce date. The case must subsequently be filed within 15 + 30=45 days from the date the legal notice is sent. In the event that the case is filed beyond that time is barred the same time. If you haven’t filed the case in your case, then the same time is now barred, but there’s another way out of that.

Why a Cheque is Dishonoured?

If the banks give to pay the amount, a check is said to be honored. While the check is said to be dishonored if the bank refuses to pay the amount. In other words, check dishonor is a condition where the bank refuses to pay the amount of check.

They draw in a bank immediately to issue a’ Cheque Return Memo‘ to the payee banker, specifying the reasons for dishonor, when the check is dishonored. The payee banker provides the payee with the memo and the dishonored check. The payee has an option to resubmit the check within three months of the date specified on the

What is a Notice of Dishonour?

A dishonor of post-dated check is a formal notice stating that the bank will not honor the instrument by presenting a check or draft. A dishonour of post-dated check notice may be given to the instrument’s holder or presenter. The issuing institution may also give it.

Conclusion

The ruling will have a far-reaching impact as thousands of check bouncing cases are pending in the country. Moroever, in non – recourse factoring transactions as the factors are exposed to bondholders, factors commonly use Section 138 route as a tactic for recovery.

Also, Read: What is the Difference between Director and Shareholder?

docsbizkit
 

Related Articles

41st GST Council Meeting
Shivani Jain
| Date: Aug 29, 2020 | Category: GST, News

Expectations and Outcomes of 41st GST Council Meeting

The 41st GST Council Meeting was held on 27.08.2020 in New Delhi. It was conducted through Video Conferencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was chaired by our Union Finance...

Read More
securities transaction tax
Savvy Midha
| Date: Dec 02, 2019 | Category: News, SEBI Advisory

Securities Transaction Tax (STT) Rules 2004 – Income Tax Implications

Securities Transaction Tax Rules 2004 introduced with effect from 2004 by the then Finance Minister, Mr. P. Chidambaram [1] to cover the purchase and sale of securities under the ambit...

Read More
42nd GST Meeting
Shivani Jain
| Date: Oct 10, 2020 | Category: GST, News

Outcomes of the 42nd GST Council Meeting

The 42nd GST Council Meeting was held on 05.10.2020 in New Delhi. The meeting was chaired by our Union Finance Minister, Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman[1]. Further, the meeting was attended by...

Read More

ARTICLES

Hi! My name is Akanksha! Let's talk.